In the face of financial shortfalls, many schools make a fundamental error: they focus on employment data to find new programs or current programs to grow. Unfortunately, there is a very limited relationship between employer needs and program margins.
In an Online World, Identifying Hidden Competitors is Critical
There is a good chance that you are losing potential students right from your own backyard. In the post-COVID world, online education is growing and the competition for student demand is intense. Students in your markets may be going right out of your own proverbial backyard, and if you aren’t looking at the right data, you may not even know it, let alone correct for it. Accurate insights are critical for making the most efficient program decisions and investing in drawing your students closer to home.
When Evaluating Online Attendance, Traditional Data is Misleading
Traditional data sources such as IPEDS are out of date, and they do not show the true picture of competition in the online space. There is better data out there, if you know where to find it and how to bring it all together. You can’t guess at this process to be effective; the right tools will guide you to address student demand, build efficiency and grow your programs.
The Problem with IPEDS Reports and Online Competition
Student demand: Consider the most recent IPEDS report for Spring 2018. Students’ program choices were made years before 2018, when they chose their major. As a result, IPEDS shows what students wanted in the past. The world and student demand change too quickly to rely on data that reflects student interest from up to five years prior.
Online competition: Here is where IPEDS data falls short. Colleges report most online completions to their headquarters’ market, not the home market of their students. In headquarters markets, IPEDS competition is overstated. Everywhere else, competition nearly disappears. For example, the University of Phoenix reports its 30,000 online completions in Phoenix (see map), even though its students are scattered across the country.
How Gray Associates Fixed the Online Competition Reporting Problem
Fixing the problem: Gray identified and addressed the online competition reporting problem head on, offering the most current and accurate data for informed analysis and decision making.
To locate online students in the states in which they are actually enrolled, Gray examines the most recent data from NC-SARA ( National Council for State Authorization Reciprocity Agreements) filings. We then combine this with two additional current proprietary sources: institutional completions by program and search data at the county level. This results in current and accurate results, allowing us to show students—and your online competition—in the correct markets. The difference between IPEDS reporting and Gray reporting speaks for itself. As you can see from the map, our example, the University of Phoenix shows its true competitive reach, far outside of just Arizona alone. Truly revealing. Furthermore, the data also shows in which cities this competition is strongest.
Keeping track of who is really in your markets and what programs they offer can help ensure that online revenue stays at home, too.
Source: Gray Associates
Welcome to day two of our Posts on Emerging Programs. Today’s program is not quite as far out there on the spectrum of emerging programs as Quantum Computing.
Here we are in the middle of our series on Emerging Programs. Today I’ll share a program that’s truly on the cusp: unmanned autonomous vehicles (UAVs).